Certified Senior Advisor (CSA) Practice Test

Question: 1 / 400

Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, which scenario is legal but not advisable?

An employee excluded for not fitting in socially

An employee not selected for training due to age

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967 is designed to protect individuals who are 40 years of age or older from discrimination based on age in the workplace. In the context of this legislation, several scenarios can arise, but the aim is to identify practices that may technically remain within the bounds of legality, despite being ill-advised from an ethical or best practices standpoint.

In the scenario where an employee is not selected for training due to age, this may technically comply with the ADEA because it could be argued that the decision was based on business needs or performance rather than purely on the individual’s age. However, this practice can signal a bias against older workers, potentially undermining workplace morale and fostering a discriminatory culture. Training opportunities are essential for career development, and excluding someone for age-related reasons—even if not overtly stated—can limit their career advancement and perpetuate negative stereotypes.

Meanwhile, the other scenarios listed generally imply actions that would not qualify as acceptable under the ADEA. Exclusion from hiring or promotion based on age directly contradicts the Act’s protective intentions, as it prohibits discrimination regarding employment decisions primarily due to a person's age. Therefore, while not advisable due to potential negative implications for workplace equity and culture

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

An older applicant not hired for age-related reasons

An experienced employee overlooked for promotion

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy